Russian Forces Mount While EU List Lengthens

b2ap3_thumbnail_RussianForcesInCrmea.jpg

US-EU Sanctions List Still Uncertain, As Russia Secures Crimea Foothold

 

More Russian troops, armored vehicles, ships at Crimean ports, fighter jets screaming by, attack helicopters flying overhead, and notices to decimated Ukraine soldiers still on Crimean streets that identify the Russians flooding on those same streets marked today’s progress as Russia secures its Crimea foothold. http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/14/us-ukraine-crisis-idUSBREA1Q1E820140314

 

As predicted by HamiltonFinanceServices.com (HFS), the talks between US Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Secretary Sergei Lavrov ended quickly and without any agreements. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/14/ukraine-crisis-john-kerry-sergey-lavrov-meet-london-talks

 

US led sanctions by the EU have solidified during the meeting between President Barack Obama and Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseny Yatseniuk, although the list of 20 elite Russian business leaders might have grown to over 100 already, even before its expected implementation to halt travel and money movement if tomorrow’s referendum fulfills expectations. http://www.euractiv.com/global-europe/eu-moves-sanctions-russians-ukra-news-534118

 

HFS analysts observe how during the past several decades of diplomacy between Russia, China, Europe, and the US, hope has sprung from mutual interests in economic prosperity. Sanctions such as those planned by the US-EU against Russian business leaders serve chiefly to undermine that hope. In the long term, planned sanctions cannot succeed, but they may push China and Russia, along with India and Indonesia, into separate economic orbits. As China becomes the world’s largest market, effectively pushing the East further from the West serves no one’s larger interests.

 

What do you think?

 

 

 

One Strong Dissent Against US and EU on Russia-Ukraine Dispute

b2ap3_thumbnail_RussiaUkraine.jpg

One American Dissent from US-EU Position on Russia-Ukraine

 

A Voice of America article portrays US Secretary of State John Kerry with his two fists clenched as if he were ready to fight, as he testified before the US Congress today. http://www.voanews.com/content/merkel-russia-risks-massive-damage-in-ukraine-crisis/1870218.html

b2ap3_thumbnail_2FistedKerry.jpg

If that is what he’s really asking for, then perhaps Russia will oblige the theatrical puppet. The US has zero credibility as a military presence in the Ukraine region, and the EU has less. http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/02/us-ukraine-crisis-usa-idUSBREA210MJ20140302

 

But go ahead, children, act out your silly gestures. http://edition.cnn.com/2014/03/06/business/europe-has-power-over-russia/

 

At HamiltonFinanceServices.com (HFS)all analysts fully agree that if the US and EU actually take a “serious series of steps” then so will China and Russia, and contrary to US and EU hopes, the US and EU have the most to loose. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/04/ukraine-crisis-shots-fired-crimea-airbase 

 

The lead HFS analyst says: True to his shallow ‘displomacy’ of gesture and empty form, Kerry told the US Congress in its hearing today that he hopes to avoid sanctions by talking with the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov tomorrow in Russia. Balderdash (a polite way to parallel Rush Limbaugh’s vulgar “Barbara Streisand” expression)!

 

HFS analysts consensually elaborate pertinent international legal problems with the EU and US positions, as follows: In the various news reports of Kerry’s testimony, no mention ever arises concerning how the duly elected president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych, was ousted by the Ukraine parliament when no constitutional provisions in Ukraine existed for such a process at the time. There were clearly articulated impeachment procedures on the Ukrainian books. However, only treason or other crime constituted grounds for impeachment, and that process was never undertaken by the head of the Ukrainian parliament, its now acting “president” Oleksandr Turchynov. So Turchynov committed treason against the Ukraine, yet the US and its pet the EU repeat the chorus that he is the Ukraine president. Russia essentially has correctly stated that Yanukovych remains the elected Ukrainian president unless and until impeachment occurs during his term or a new election is duly called in the election cycle. The reason neither the US nor EU mention this significant legal issue is because all they want is to cloud the issue with finger pointing, fist clenching, and figurative frothing at their mouths. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_Ukraine

 

What do you think?