Nye-Ham Debate Over Religion and Science

When news hit that Bill Nye, the popular US science commentator, would debate Ken Ham, a Christian minister from Kentucky who runs a museum about creationism, I rolled my eyes. It sounded like another publicity scam for the far right Christians. Who cares whether religionists’ assertions based on personal belief or scientists’ attempts at more objective observations form the basis of what a society decides are its laws and mores? The stadium hosting that debate sold out quickly. It also fulfilled the publicity expectation; loads of sympathizers clicked onto Ham’s museum website. Maybe I should leave the tempest in its teapot, but the old debate, science v. religion, still troubles me in the context of contemporary news about wars around the globe.

 

On my blog I have commented about war already. http://hamiltonfinanceservices.com/?p=1503 The troubles in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Thailand, South Sudan, Ukraine, Venezuela, and Mali highlight one over-arching theme: War, particularly about who is in charge, plagues this planet almost continually. That theme sounds like the second law of thermodynamics writ large in human history. You know the law, however you word it: Disorder increases. In terms of human history, war persists.

 

The Nye-Ham debate caused no war although the same cannot be said of similar debates between Sunnis and Shiites. Why don’t Nye and Ham resolve their differences with an agreement such as, “Some prefer to see with their imaginations without further testing and others prefer to see with their imaginations but only if confirmed by testing.” That impresses me as a resolution of the religion-science tension: Individuals choose to believe whatever comforts them more, simple fantasy or apparently verifiable fantasy.

 

That resolution solves nothing. People build societies based on their beliefs about reality and goodness. Without implicit agreement on how to form a worthy belief, society will shake itself into oblivion. Observe how the United States has fared since its realization that it has no shared soul, that is, no shared belief in God or secularism or materialism or … anything. I wonder when the US will descend into civil war. Will it happen soon after it falls into servitude due to indebtedness?

 

Nye and Ham won the approval of their established followers and from what can be gleaned from news coverage no one moved towards one view or the other as a result of the debate. Does that mean the wars, even if won or lost, will never change the beliefs of those who communicate through violence?

 

What do you think?

 

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2014/02/04/271648691/watch-the-creationism-vs-evolution-debate-bill-nye-and-ken-ham

 

 

http://news.yahoo.com/bill-nye-bible-doesn-39-t-tell-earth-093334127.html?vp=1

Web Giants Disclose Some Spy Order Compliance Records

 

b2ap3_thumbnail_BigBro.jpgRemember how Google sued to reveal its role in the US spy program called PRISM brought to light through Edward Snowden’s disclosures. That was in June 2013.

With that pressure from Google and other web giants like Yahoo, Facebook, and Microsoft, the US relaxed rules about their disclosures, permitting reports at least six months past in increments of 1000 or more.

Today those web giants reported somewhat concrete data. It shows less support by the big web companies than many suspected. Here’s a summary of their reports in reply to orders from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court for content of customers.

Facebook 5000 to 5999 content orders answered

Google 9000 to 9999 content orders answered

Microsoft 15000 to 15999 content orders answered

Yahoo 30000 to 30999 content orders answered

Despite the financial capacity to litigate head to head with the US government, the web giants bent to the will of the US to answer thousands of requests. The number of requests implies how active the FISA court must be, although no reports clarify how many other records US agencies such as the NSA simply stole through wire taps, satellite signal capture, and microwave decryption.

Is this enough disclosure? No, not nearly enough, according to Senator Patrick Leahy, chair of the US Senate Judiciary Committee, a Democrat from the State of Vermont. Six members of Congress have demanded more disclosure by filing a brief with the US Supreme Court last July 2013.

b2ap3_thumbnail_BigBro_20140204-010134_1.jpgSome patriotic souls undoubtedly support any action by the US government that might have even a remote chance of improving national security. Other equally patriotic souls grow increasingly concerned with erosion of US citizen privacy over the past ten years. It is time for a national conversation about how far our government should be permitted to go to erode our historic freedoms in order to build walls of security around us. More specifically, HamiltonFinanceServices.com (HFS) calls for much more action by the US congress, the web giants, and citizens of the US alarmed by government spying in the name of national security. HFS analysts believe the majority should speak out on this issue. Do you agree?

http://www.techradar.com/us/news/world-of-tech/google-challenges-fisa-court-s-gag-order-over-prism-1159977

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/28/business/government-to-allow-technology-companies-to-disclose-more-data-on-surveillance-requests.html?_r=0

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/03/us-internet-nsa-idUSBREA121H920140203

http://www.nationaljournal.com/technology/internet-giants-amid-grumbling-release-new-data-on-government-spying-20140203

http://amash.house.gov/press-release/bipartisan-coalition-urges-fisa-court-release-opinions

http://HamiltonFinanceServices.com

 b2ap3_thumbnail_MJ.jpgThe 2014 Super Bowl in the US, nicknamed after various references to marijuana (mj) because the two competing teams come from the states of Washington and Colorado where mj recreational use is legal, has raised to a higher level than ever the national debate on mj legalization.  For the US, a list of states where use is now legal illustrates how controversial the topic remains.

To begin what HamiltonFinanceServices (HFS) hopes can be a robust conversation, we offer our analysts’ first impressions on pros and cons of mj legalization.  Our HFS list distils 1.5 hours of discussion among the seven members of our staff.

The advantages of legalized mj include quality control and tax base expansion by governments, destigmatization of mj smoking, reduced costs in the justice system, potential health benefits, and improved economic opportunities.  The disadvantages include potential health risks, cascading effects of more intoxication (potentially increased number of auto crashes, etc.), potential to lead to other drug use or abuse, and an over-arching concern for moral issues associated with self intoxication.  This list merely begins a larger examination, and each point might involve many aspects.

What insights and arguments do you have to share on legalization of marijuana in your region?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/01/29/from-dry-to-high-your-guide-to-state-pot-laws.html

http://swampland.time.com/2014/01/29/marijuana-legalization-holder-colorado-washington/

http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/27/22470647-poll-majority-of-americans-support-efforts-to-legalize-marijuana?lite

http://www.drugpolicy.org/marijuana-legalization-and-regulation

http://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp/ondcp-fact-sheets/marijuana-legalization

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis

http://norml.org/

http://www.livescience.com/24554-medical-marijuana.html